The field of biotechnology has really contributed to the
collaboration and integration of artists and scientists. Through the manipulation of living organisms
and their genomes, scientists and artists both contribute towards a greater
understanding of humans and the world around us. It is arguable, however, that
scientists use biotechnology to help advance current human conditions while
artists use it as an expressive medium of their artwork. But I believe we can
learn a lot from an artists’ interpretation of biotechnology.
An artist that really captured my attention was Eduardo Kac,
a transgenic artist who implants the Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) gene into
a rabbit. He uses Alba not as a genetic object, but instead as a social object.
If one had no prior knowledge that it was GFB bunny, then they would not be
able to the tell difference under most lighting. The inter-species social communication
should not be affected and the rabbit should experience treatment similar to
that of any other rabbit. The project highlights the fact that he was not
trying to make the bunny meet specific requirements, but rather to have her be accepted
with her genetic difference.
If we begin by looking at the technologies that go into the
genetic manipulation of transgenic organisms, we should also see how these can
be applied to human genomes. Artist Adam Zaretsky addresses the advances in
human recombinant possibilities through the Human Germline Gene Therapy. This
therapy isolates and alters the offending gene, then introduces it into the
embryo before it has differentiated.
This alteration is permanent and capable in effecting subsequent
generations. However, the manipulation of the human germline in inducing
genetic changes to possibly stop lethal birth defects or diseases creates an
ethical problem. It allows human the potential to create a “perfect” species in
regards to aesthetics. Yet, what traits or qualities are considered
aesthetically superior to another? I believe this is the limit to human
creativity as we simply cannot determine what aesthetics is better as no
individual is better than another.
Works Cited
Clark, Josh. “Bottlenecks Made Humans Less Diverse.” Discovery News. 23 Oct 2009. Image. 10
Nov 2013. <http://news.discovery.com/human/genetics/human-diversity-bottlenecks.htm>
Kac, Eduardo. “GFP Bunny.” Kac. 2000. Web. 10 Nov 2013. <http://www.ekac.org/gfpbunny.html>
Kac, Eduardo. “GFP Bunny.” Kac. 2000. Image. 10 Nov 2013. <http://www.ekac.org/gfpbunny.html>
“The Stem Cell Debate: Is It Over?” Learn.Genetics. The University of Utah. Image. 10 Nov 2013. <http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/tech/stemcells/scissues/>
Zaretsky, Adam. “The Art of Germline Mutagenesis.” Emutagen. Web. 10 Nov 2013. <http://emutagen.com/germline.html>
Vesna, Victoria. “BioTech Art Lectures I-V.” YouTube. Web. 10 Nov 2013.
Hi Elizabeth,
ReplyDeleteI also agree that we can learn a lot from artists' interpretation of biotechnology. Artists tend to enjoy pushing the limits to see how things work and would work under certain conditions, a trait most scientists tend to fear to have. However, there is a limit to how far limits can be pushed, in a sense. Great post!